Zarina Diyas vs Diletta Cherubini Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance:
  • Cherubini has a slight edge, winning 37.5% of points on their second serve, compared to 36.05% by Diyas.
  • Could Cherubini's slightly better second serve be a decisive factor? It certainly aids in precision match predictions.
• Return Game Statistics:
  • Cherubini outperforms in returning second serves with a 50.42% success rate, whereas Diyas achieves 49.04%.
  • On first serve returns, Cherubini again leads with 36.74% to Diyas's 34.62%.
• Pressure Handling:
  • Under pressure, Diyas has saved 47.43% of breakpoints, compared to Cherubini’s 44.96%.
  • Does Diyas’ ability to save breakpoints suggest she excels in high-stakes moments? It's a significant factor for in-game predictions.
• Overall Performance in Recent Year:
  • Diyas has a superior win rate of 69.09%, while Cherubini holds a 58.57% success rate.
  • Does Diyas’ higher win percentage indicate better overall competence?
• Surface Preferences:
  • Cherubini prefers hard courts, winning 62% of matches, while Diyas excels on indoor hard courts with a 67% success rate.
• Match Levels and Opponent Quality:
  • Diyas has faced higher-ranked opponents, averaging rank 319.13, compared to Cherubini’s 378.73.
  • This potentially suggests Diyas could be more accustomed to stronger competition.
• Deciding Set Performance:
  • In matches going the distance, Diyas edges out Cherubini with a 73% success rate in deciding sets, compared to Cherubini's 70%.
• Breakpoint Conversion:
  • Cherubini converts breakpoints at a rate of 42.41%, slightly better than Diyas’s 39.59%.

Editorial Prediction (June 21, 2025, UTC):

Cherubini demonstrates consistency with second serve points and return games, showing slight superiority in these areas compared to Diyas. These statistics suggest Cherubini could have the upper hand during rallies.

Despite Diyas’ strength in breakpoint saves and higher overall win percentage over the past year, Cherubini's proficiency in converting breakpoints may neutralize Diyas' resilience under pressure.

Importantly, Diyas has consistently played against stronger opponents and achieved greater success in deciding sets, an indicator of her competitive edge.

While Cherubini has been convincing on hard courts, Diyas’ formidable play on indoor hard surfaces adds another layer of complexity to the prediction. Taking into consideration these factors, Diyas is slightly favored to emerge victorious in this clash.